Overcoming the Stigmatization of Military Personnel with Disabilities in the Context of Contemporary Social Transformations

Abstract

Abstract. In the context of the full-scale war and profound social transformations in Ukraine, ensuring equal opportunities and non-discrimination for military personnel who acquire disabilities as a result of combat actions is particularly relevant. The growing number of veterans with war experience highlights the need for scientific reflection on the mechanisms for overcoming stigmatization as a prerequisite for their full social reintegration. Purpose. This article provides a comprehensive theoretical and methodological analysis of the problems of overcoming the stigmatization of military personnel with disabilities under contemporary social transformations, considering historical, socio-psychological, and ethical factors that shape stigmatizing attitudes in society. The study aims to identify mechanisms reproducing social inequality at the intersection of war experience, disability, and civilian expectations, as well as to substantiate an interdisciplinary approach to veterans’ social integration. Methods. The research employs a combination of general scientific and specialized methods, including theoretical analysis and synthesis of approaches to understanding stigma; the historical-comparative method to examine the influence of the Soviet legacy on contemporary marginalization practices; a systemic approach to reveal relationships between individual psychological states and social interpretations; elements of critical disability theory to reconsider the medicalized model; and interdisciplinary analysis integrating socio-psychological and neuroethical perspectives. Results. Stigmatization of military personnel with disabilities is a multidimensional social process encompassing institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal levels. Historically shaped perceptions of “normativity” and Soviet social control practices contributed to the consolidation of a reductionist view of persons with disabilities as “limited” or “incomplete,” which continues to influence contemporary discourse. In the case of military personnel with disabilities, stigma is dual: the combination of physical changes and psychological consequences of combat experience forms the basis for prejudiced expectations, social distancing, and doubts regarding professional competence. Psycho-emotional states are often perceived by civilians as dangerous or unstable, intensifying social isolation and complicating reintegration. Overcoming stigmatization cannot be achieved solely through the formal codification of the principle of non-discrimination. An effective strategy combines psychological support, development of social interaction networks, access to rehabilitation programs, professional retraining, and fostering a culture of respect for veterans’ dignity. Public recognition of military contributions to state defense is an important resource for resocialization and professional self-determination. Conclusions. Stigmatization of military personnel with disabilities is a complex social phenomenon shaped by historical narratives, socio-psychological mechanisms, and contemporary interpretations of traumatic experience. Its mitigation requires an interdisciplinary approach aimed at transforming social attitudes, developing inclusive policies, and promoting a culture of respect for the dignity and agency of military personnel.